20 April, 2010

Press the 'Ctrl' Key on Technology

A machine in Switzerland that can replicate the Big Bang has started spinning. Talk-radio hosts take calls about how, in less than 200 years, computers and the internet will have surpassed humans and “have a mind of their own”. It seems technology is taking over.

Maybe it already has. A recent survey amongst teens shows televisions, iPods, screens, and wires are everywhere in their home, school, and social places.

Rest assured, “War of the Worlds” is not inevitable; spaceships will not come down to replace us with PCs and Macs. The Matrix does not exist! While these concepts from the news and films are far-fetched and provide entertainment, let us think about the place technology already has in our lives.

A question: What does the term “technologically devoid” mean to you? Is it a positive thing?

Contrary to popular thought, the Amish don't see anything particularly wrong with technology. They will use it in their barns, but do not let it into their homes. "Technology destroys the kind of family-life God intended us to have naturally."

CONSIDER: Technology changes life's rhythm as we sleep in, stay up late, and allow all sorts of unnatural influences into our homes.

As a result of technology:
  • We seldom get 8 hours of good sleep.
  • We sometimes expose ourselves and others to values that often shock us.  
  • We have new modes of transport and communication that have pushed us further away from each other (we are the most connected generation, but don’t know how to talk to our neighbours) and seduce us into going places we shouldn't or entertaining people and ideas we're better off ignoring.

 Some technology can start out right and end up wrong.

Who’s in control? Is there too much technology in our lives? Should we unplug sometimes? Some examples: Has the phone or a programme interrupted us from living with the people around us? Are our life problems solved in an hour as humorously and efficiently as in primetime? Television can set up an unhealthy and difficult standard we can’t match.

Perhaps you feel a little attacked. Maybe you won’t read this article because it’s not posted online! Let me offer some resolution:
Limit computer or television intake as a family. Lobby for shows and applications to make the cut; analyze your reasons through a Christian worldview, then scrutinize it and talk about what you just saw.

Use call answering as a filter. Some technology is a blessing, especially if it protects us from technology. With call display and voice mail, you choose when you allow disturbance into a life lived with significant others.

Take control!

A balanced use of technology is necessary, so that it serves us and not vice-versa. This is not un-Christian or dishonest, and you can still be culturally cool without all this technology and media influence. Christ always found ways to deal with everything important while minimizing distraction and interruption. We are challenged to do the same.

My advice: Check out your church library.  Borrow a book or movie, something to improve you or your family. Better yet, do something together as a family. Spend some time everyday being “un-plugged”.

17 March, 2010

St Patrick: separating the man from the myth.

Just in time for what is usually an annual beer-fest and pseudo-Irish celebrations, I thought I would shed a little light on the patron saint of the emerald isle.
The following video is a nice place to start: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TCB5QhHVJA
However, if you'd care to read it, the following is a paper I wrote on St Patrick:

Every March 17th, in cities and towns across North America, people flock to the nearest Irish pub, dressed green all over, trading their nationality for an Irish one just to enjoy a few pints of green beer, watch a parade, and sing ‘O’ Danny Boy’ to honour a saint some 1,500 years ago.


St Patrick is one of three of the most popular of all saints; recognised world wide along with St Nicholas and St Valentine. However, his character and story, as with Nicholas and Valentine, seem clouded in mystery and fable. Mythopoeia in nature, stories of his chasing snakes from Ireland and using a shamrock to explain the Trinity come out every March 17th as the world celebrates his feast day. It will be the intent of this paper to uncover the true St Patrick and explain why he is worthy of remembrance and admiration.

In order to learn about and better understand the man behind the myth, one must ask several questions of the subject. Using his only surviving writings and works from specialists in Celtic history and the Irish church this paper will discuss several aspects. a) Patrick’s personal background and history. b) Who Patrick was as a person and his theology. c) What he did for Ireland and the Church during his time. d) How he has become known and why. e) Lastly, a consideration of the importance and impact he has for study and life in the Church today.

Realising the unknown about the past and the fact this ‘saint’ was human, different perspectives are taken into account. After such an evaluation, it should be clearer who this fifth century saint was.

Fortunately, for the student of St Patrick, he has written somewhat of an autobiography in his Confession. Discussion of this work develops later, but to address it now for some introductory information is helpful. The exact place and time of St Patrick’s birth is something unknown with certainty. However, the evidence from his own writings suggest he is born near the village of Bannavem Taburniae , but it is not precise and has no modern day equivalent. It can be said that he was born in Britain in what is perhaps now Wales, but noting in the fourth century it was a Roman Britain and very much not what is understood as the Britain of modernity. The best argument for a date sets it between the years 387-90, though some historians put it much later. He is born to parents Calpornius, a deacon, and Concessa his wife. His given name, ‘Patricius Magonus Sucatus’ honours the customs and relationships of the time . What his life was like during his first 15 years is the realm of conjecture, but Patrick does allude to being brought up in a well-to-do lifestyle where the religion of his father as deacon and grandfather as priest was not truly known to him (Conf. 1). Other commentators and biographers will draw from Irish Annals and the like what is known about his father or that time, but due to Patrick’s silence, not much is certain. In his Confession He speaks of only one unknown sin committed in an hour when he is 15, an act he privately confesses to a friend, and then says nothing until his kidnapping when he is 16.

It is this kidnapping along with thousands of others that Patrick attributes as God’s punishment for his lack of faith and obedience to Him (Conf. 1). Not much is known from his works about all that happened in his captivity, but we can deduce he was made to work for King Neill at herding sheep and spent long days and nights alone.

This captivity is crucial in his life. It is a time when God does a work in his heart and mind. Patrick tells us how, with so much time alone with his thoughts, he would pray hundreds of times a day and night, as God opened his unbelief and showed him his sin and His salvation. The captivity lasted approximately six years until he had a dream and heard a voice telling him that he must escape and return to his homeland. Boarding a ship, he made the long trek home.

Patrick’s escape was an adventurous time. He helped his shipmates when the food was gone to pray to God for provision. An approximate chronology of events from his escape, (411) to the time when Patrick is consecrated as Bishop (432) covers time at Lerins before getting back to Britain. Then there is study at the monastery in Auxerre where he is ordained. It is at Auxerre where he spends several years as deacon before he is sent to Ireland by Germanus, (a bishop) . Seeming to fast-forward several points, Patrick comes to Ireland through a calling from God (Conf. 3).

He does not come to a land without any Christian influence already there. Palladius is first sent to Ireland as Bishop, but was killed after one year of mission. It is important to know Patrick built upon the existing, weak Christian church. Patrick came not to battle heresy or Pelagianism, but to further the Church of Rome. As a result of his work, Ireland came into connection with the rest of the Roman Empire and made part of universal Christianity. He helped to convert more of the west than was previously reached, something that would otherwise have failed in Ireland due to paganism’s predominance. As well, he helped to organise the existing church, secured its permanence, and introduced Latin along with Roman culture, literature and ideas to the Irish, which allowed them to eventually increase their worldview and status in the world.

Many of the stories perpetuated about Patrick’s work in Ireland are either untrue or unreliable. There is not a mentioning of teaching the doctrine of the trinity through using a shamrock, nor is there report of chasing snakes out of Ireland. Surely if he had done so, he would have written of it himself in the confession.

Most of his ministry in Ireland is understood from the perspective of a biographer or, in the case of Patrick’s earliest accounts, save his own writings, hagiography. Muirchu and Tirechan of the 7th and 8th centuries are the first men to write a ‘Life of Patrick’ but have both been found unreliable. Patrick’s efforts seem to have good affects and be unchallenged, but some event originating in Britain brings controversy to Patrick’s life and gives purpose for his writing his two major works. No one can say when the event occurs, but late in his ministry, the prince Coroticus came to the Irish coast and ruthlessly raided many of Patrick’s recent converts. Patrick writes a strong letter of rebuke to the man who murdered his converts and seeks to save the ones that are still alive. The letter has a similar tone as his later work, the Confession, in that there is much in he way of defence and theology explicit throughout. He urges Christians to shun those having to do with the atrocity; he seeks repentance from Coroticus and excommunicates them who carried it out.

The Confession is primarily an apologetic, but the reason given by Patrick himself is that it is to render thanksgiving to God for His hand in Patrick’s life. Agreement across the board by all biographers is that Patrick writes as one who knows his Bible, the Latin Bible, and his lack of knowledge with literacy and rhetoric is obvious in his writing of these works. At times he will simply quote scripture at the risk of overstating his point simply because he will rely upon it for wording and communication. At times, it is to express his authority as bishop. Notwithstanding, Patrick’s humility comes though on every page as he speaks of his lowly state and position before God and how unlearned he is. As for the popular ‘Lorica’, or ‘Breastplate of St Patrick’, it is wrongly recognised as his. Due to its dating centuries after Patrick, the Latin used is also unlike the raw Latin of the Confession or Letter.

Patrick has greatly influenced the church through his acts of holiness and leaving behind his two small works. The importance of studying him today is due to his openness within those works; we feel we can truly know him because of his frankness. It can help us to understand Ancient Christian Britain and we are able to see character in his humility, the shortcomings that he does not hide, but pursues God’s call all the same. We can follow his journey as a young boy kidnapped, serving his master, escaping back to his homeland and returning as bishop to his captors eventually giving his life to them as he establishes God’s Kingdom there

Patrick died in 461 in Ireland in the county of Saul, though he longed to return to the church he founded in Armagh to rest. A man of integrity, compassionate to the people he ministered amongst; his story is one of inspiration. Fortunately, he left behind an imperishable memorial, his Confession, helping separate man from myth.





SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bury, John B. The Life of St Patrick and His Place in History. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc., 1905

Cathcart, William. The Ancient British and Irish Churches: Including the Life and Labours of St Patrick. Philadelphia: American Baptist Publication Society, 1894

Chadwick, Nora K. The Age of the Saints in the Early Celtic Church. London: Oxford University Press, 1961

Gallico, Paul. The Steadfast Man: A Biography of St Patrick. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co, Inc. 1958

Gonzalez, Justo L. The Story of Christianity Volume 1: The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1984.

Hanson, R.P.C. The Life and Writings of the Historical Saint Patrick. NY: Seabury Press, 1983

McNeill, John T. The Celtic Churches: A History, A.D. 200 to 1200. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974

Olsen, Ted. Christianity and the Celts. Downers Grove, IL: Intervarsity Press, 2003

Vann, Father Joseph, ed. Lives of Saints. New York: John J. Crawley & Co., Inc., 1954.

11 February, 2010

Deception, Trickery and Other Popular Forms of Reaching Out.

C.S. Lewis writes:  
"Even in literature and art, no man who bothers about originality will ever be original: whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring twopence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it."
I believe he is right.  For years when I started out in this ministry, I thought I had to repackage and re-invent things so I could be just as effective and popular as the next guy.  I was frequently trying to put my own spin on things so I might appear clever or original.  I have discovered now that as I try less and give to God more, all the while being honest with what I offer Him and others ~ no strings attached ~ God blesses it and it does become original enough to strike someone in a way they hadn't thought of before.
I agree with another great philosopher in saying that "there is nothing new under the sun" and that our message is a couple millenia old, but one would be surprised at the constant effort made to soft-soap, water-down or manipulate the message ~ or others ~ in order to be effective in conveying it.
Example: Come out to this really fun event with pizza, friends, music and games ... then once we've lured you in we'll hit you with the Gospel!  Be my firend so I might have an opportunity to share this tract with you. 
I think authenticity and consistency in living a message of reconciliation and redemption is the most effective and truly God-ordained method of outreach.
People can see through slick programmes and projects, rallies and tracts are declining in results (even using that word I cringe, because that is what it has become: results driven); we've done them for years and they are becoming increasingly inefficient. 
Now that I have said so and effectively "thrown down the gauntlet", please pray for me to be consisent and authentic "as I go". And read Paul's thought and defence here: I Thessalonians 2. 3-5.

27 January, 2010

Tickets to the Superbowl

Sometimes I listen to the local Christian radio on the AM dial, and I enjoy it, but once in a while they'll give the microphone to some 'kooks'.
A few times I have heard this fellow during a particular programme through the afternoon and he is one of those guys you need to take with a grain of salt. Well, today I was listening but the shaker emptied real fast ...
He was on about tickets to the up-and-coming Superbowl and likening the attendance of the event ~ even claiming the ticket ~ to gaining entrance and the experience we shall have in Heaven. Now, I agree; the anaology of Christ being our ticket to heaven and everyone needs a ticket to get in is great. But it ends there. The rest of his analogy is faulty! First off, the tickets are sold for the most part and we can NOT purchase or earn our way to Heaven. Secondly, [depending on your view of election you may agree with this] the tickets and availabilty are only for a limited number of folks. Nonetheless, there are levels of enjoyment at the Superbowl that we do NOT have in Heaven, which he said we did! i.e. watching it on television in the bar, from the 'nosebleeds' , from the 50-yard line, some from the press-box and others with "meet the players" passes. I'm sorry but the analogy breaks down a few seats ago!
What does one do with statements from Paul about "seventh heaven" and all that? Perhaps there is somthing there to discover. However, I do not feel our local show host this afternoon has it figured yet.
My only thought to all of this is it is not empowering, not hopeful, and it makes me feel more like I'm in 18th century class-society Britain than a resident of the Kingdom of Heaven. He continued to say it will be that some are to enjoy special company with the saints in Heaven in their mansions, while many simply can expect a meager living in our shack, hoping to catch a glimpse of the millenial banquet on the divine plasma.
I will agree with something he mentioned about the spiritual fruit in our life indicating our following Christ and it indicating reward, to an extent, but I know that some of the Bible's heroes did some pretty 'shack worthy' things while they were here. When I hear people go off on the "classes of heaven" I just wonder if they'll be up as high as they think.
For what it is worth; if they are right, and this rant is misplaced, then I conceed a shack in heaven is still world's better than anything we have here. If for no other reason but that Christ will be there, but so will all who follow Him. I wouldn't wish to be anywhere else.

18 January, 2010

Phos Hilaron and Allowing the Light Through

It is amazing the things one thinks while in the bath. Certainly, many people do their best thinking while alone in the bath for precisely that reason: they are alone, without distraction, and will be there, likely, for a while.

I had a "teachable moment" this morning in the bath with my son, (who is four years old and, as a result, is often permitted to interrupt my times in the bath if he needs to use the bathroom) who enquired as to why there was a small orange glimmer of light on the wall beside the sink. I had to think a moment, and then realised the plastic handle on my razor is orange and was picking up the light from the bulb above it. I then went into a lecture about the three stages of light allowances that I could remember from grade school:
  1. something transluscent allows some light to pass through it, (like the razor handle),
  2. something transparent allowed most or all light to pass through it,
  3. and something opaque does not allow any like to pass through it but will instead cast a shadow.
He was obviously amazed at Daddy's brilliance as he said nothing, flushed the toilet and left.

Undoubtedly some of you will look upon the title of this blog with some familiarity, but many will scratch their head and wonder if I've mispelt something. I have stolen the title from our most ancient hymn: [http://encyclopedia.tfd.com/Phos+Hilaron]  I steal it because I feel it aptly names the concept I discoverd in the bath.

Once my son had left I rejoined my thoughts which mingled with the recent exploration of grade-school science. How transparent was I, and what Light is passing through, if any? Of course, you may now have put together I am talking about Christ, the Light of the world, or, the Gladdening Light "phos hilaron".

As we live and breath, as we go about our business, as we respond to the world around us, do we allow some of that light to pass, all of it, or are we spiritually opaque?  There has been much written on such a topic, challenges given by many much more capable than I, but I hope to simply get you to do some self-evaluation (2 Cor 13. 5).  I know I left the bath that morning a cleaner man on both the in and outside.

Something for the "think-ubator"

11 January, 2010

God Put a Smile Upon Your Face

"Stop your anger! Turn from your rage!  Do not envy others - it only leads to harm" Psalm 37. 8 NLT
In an event of divine coincidence, I found myself experiencing stress while reading this verse and listening to a CD in the backround.  On thier sophmore effort, Coldplay has a song by this title. While the message of the song is more humanistic than the Psalm, I found the message to be similar and was encouraged almost overwhelmingly. 
We should not be sad, angry or worried about anything because our God has things under his control. He has indeed put a smile upon our faces; wearing it is testimony to His strength in our life and not a naive "head in the sand".
Smile today with the smile God gave you :)

07 January, 2010

The Gospel of Candyland

Once again this week I found myself in another "teachable moment" with my son.
One of his favourite games lately is the Milton Bradley boardgame he received for Christmas, the pre-school hit who's original players would now play it with their grandchildren: Candyland. I don't know much of its history, and the story-line as it is printed on current editions of the game's box liner make no mention of it, but it sure has some Christian allegory to it. Let me explain.
As I started out saying, I had a teachable moment with my son this week; while playing the game for the dozenth time, he asked me why the liquorice tripped us up and why it was there. (if you are not familiar with the game, more of its premise will become evident as this blog continues.)
He is very good at the game and excited by it ~ he can play it several times in one sitting without tiring, unlike his father.  I tried to answer him to the best of my ability and found something interesting developing in my explanation.  We move our players (represented by gingerbread men) along a brightly coloured trail on our way to the celestial city of Candyland.  Along the way there are various "sticky spots" where Lord Liquorice has left traps for us to slow us on our way, (resulting in a missed turn).  My nutshell explanation was this:

Candyland = heaven; the King is GOD; Lord Licorice represents Satan and, therefore, the liquorice he leaves around on the path is the tempting, candy-like trip-up on our way to Candyland like sin.  Lord Licorice was himself a resident of cnadyland at one point, but was put out when once he felt he should have a greater position in the Kingdom.  Failing to comply with the demands, he now hides out in the forest hating the King and anyone who seeks to visit him.  So, possessing still some remnant of his time in Candyland, he uses pseudo-candy to throw people off the trial and slow their arrival.

My son was tracking along nicely and I found a way to once again see the Truth of God around me in everyday things.  I believe he enjoys the game on a deeper level now and I was able to help ensure our families commitment to Deuteronomy 6. 7.